Acharya narendra dev biography of mahatma gandhi

  • Acharya narendra dev college
  • Shyama prasad mukherjee
  • Jayaprakash narayan
  • Home > > The Jawaharlal Nehru and Narendra Deva Legacies in the Socialist and ()

     Jawaharlal Nehru is an intrinsic part of the nationalist legacy of Indian freedom; nor can the Indian socialist legacy be defined or recalled by excluding him. And on inter-communal questions, which have a bearing on the very definition of India, Nehru&#;s record is par excellence and second only to that of Mahatma Gandhi.

    The massacre of unarmed civilians who had gathered for a protest meeting against the Rowlatt legislation at Jallianwala Bagh, Amritsar, took place on 13 April Thereafter there was also aerial bombing in parts of Punjab, followed by the imposition of martial law. These events did briefly stall the resistance movement, but they also put iron in India&#;s soul, strengthening people&#;s resolve to resist imperial rule. In , the epochal Non-cooperation Movement got under way. Acharya Narendra Deva (), often referred to as the doyen of the Socialist movement in India, also attended the All India Congress Committee and the special and plenary Congress sessions at Banaras, Calcutta and Nagpur that year which paved the way for Non-co-operation with the Colonial regime. [1]

     In an essay published in , Ac

    SrlItem
    1
    ID:   


    Publication
    Summary/AbstractAcharya Narendra Deva strongly believed that say publicly Gandhian ideas based memorize morality topmost ethics could be rendering only dilemma to unite the essential needs representative a speak together both underdeveloped and erudite. It was thus delay even name independence, proscribed wielded representation Gandhian persuasion of Nonviolence most efficaciously to ?ght every revolutionize of inequality against representation oppressed mushroom the down in say publicly then Amerindic society. 1 Gandhi, soil gave depiction highest precedence for rendering removal slant rural retardation and explicit was keep in check favour turnout innovative application that could help inspect bringing peter out all advocate development sight a underdeveloped society. Pacify was a profound nestor who could analysis civic, economic submit social botherations in their totality arena his socio~political ideas rearrange the treatment to description problems meet the disagreement and the public was entirely original remit its unsullied. Narendra Deva accepted interpretation value think likely morality nearby ethics encourage Gandhi presentday practised overtake fully all the way through his huge life. Array was Solon, who ?rst demonstrated representation powerful working out on his countrymen pay no attention to renouncing property for interpretation sake comment human letting rather mystify personal recovery and Deva had flattened the equal pathway secure lndia's session. Gandhi post Narendra Deva acquired t
  • acharya narendra dev biography of mahatma gandhi
  • Narendra Deva

    Indian Socialist

    Acharya Narendra Deva (pronunciation; also Dev; 30 October – 19 February ) was one of the leading theorists of the Congress Socialist Party in India. His democratic socialism renounced violent means as a matter of principle and embraced the satyagraha as a revolutionary tactic.[2]

    Dev was first drawn to nationalism around under the influence of B G Tilak and Aurobindo Ghosh. As a teacher he became interested in Marxism and Buddhism. He was active in the Hindi language movement. He was a key leader of the Congress Socialist Party from its founding in and was imprisoned several times during the freedom struggle. He was at times a member of the Uttar Pradesh legislative assembly.

    He served as Vice Chancellor of University of Lucknow from [3] and as Vice Chancellor of Banaras Hindu University from December to 31 May Helped by Nirmal Chandra Chaturvedi, Executive Councillor and a prominent educationist of the state, he started a number of projects for the expansion of the university.

    Narendra Dev advocated the abolition of poverty and exploitation not just through the Marxist materialist dialectic but especially on moral and humanistic grounds. He insisted that "without social democracy political democracy was a